Task 1 opens the speaking section by handing you somebody else's problem. A short written situation appears on the screen: your cousin is thinking about adopting a rescue dog, your co-worker wants to study part-time, your aunt retires next month and is afraid she will be bored. In every version, a named person with a stated relationship to you has asked for your advice, and the instruction is simply to give it.
The clock is 30 seconds to prepare and 90 seconds to record. The preparation is not skippable on the real test, and the recording starts on its own the instant the prep runs out, which is why walking in with a plan for those 30 seconds matters more here than anywhere else in the section. Ninety seconds is the longest response the test asks for, and it is worth knowing what that means in practice: roughly 200 to 230 words at a comfortable Canadian speaking pace.
Here is the thing candidates get wrong before they say a word. There is no correct advice. Nobody is checking whether adopting the dog is wise, and no rater has an opinion about part-time study. The problem exists purely as a surface for language, and the entire question is whether you can take a position, develop it, and sound like a person the listener would actually take advice from. That reframing is worth more than any list of tips: you are not solving the problem, you are demonstrating the machinery you use on problems.
The other thing built into every Task 1 prompt is a relationship. Not a generic "someone", but a cousin, a co-worker, a friend who arrived six months ago, an aunt. That word is not decoration. Tone is one of the four things Task Fulfillment explicitly scores, and the register you owe an aunt who is nervous about retiring is measurably different from the one you owe a colleague weighing a course load. Reading the prompt and missing the relationship is the quietest way to cap your band on this task.